|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
790
   |
Posted - 2013.05.28 19:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:If you any of you feel that changes are bad in some way please hit me up with eve mail with reasons and how would you like this or that mechanic to be implemented and I will make sure the information is available to CCP in constructive manner.
C'mon Chitsa, I know that Eve players are illiterate math challenged morons that need color bars instead of numbers but devs should be able to read what people are pointing out as bad moves at least in this thread. But take a look where dev's badge is here and it will be clear that they don't care about anybody's but their own point of view.
It started when CCP Betik saw something in metrics that justified eviscerating lowsec pvp with removal of static DEDs, with Odyssey it seems those mythical metrics show much more about how people play Eve and apparently all devs are looking at them.
I am not my skills but...
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
790
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 20:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:My job as CSM is to make sure player feedback is listened to. We are player representatives and I will try my best to do my job.
Antagonizing CCP will not fix issues we players want to get fixed. What is needed is constructive feedback
That's very nice of you and I don't say you shouldn't do that. But you have to admit there are some disturbances in the force on line what was promised, what feedback we are asked for and what is delivered.
I have an impression that only dev who actually listened to feedback in his threads and reacted on what really was pointed out as bad move is CCP Rise and his BS tiercide stickies in F&I.
I am not my skills but...
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
791
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 20:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Roime wrote:There are massive differences in how devs and teams react to feedback. I find most of them very responsive, the teams handling the Launcher and Scanner development do not represent CCP majority in this aspect.
Yeah but launcher derp preventing huge amount of people from logging in and those magical aspects of how probes behave are few orders of magnitude apart. Here we are pointing out how changes are cutting on consequences side of players mistakes rather than on probes not working at all which would be an equivalent of launcher initial fiasco.
I still hope that all this is - as previous poster wrote - just Crucible of exploration system, hard changes needed to move all universe forward and next expansion will be built upon those changes and full of ossum they promised.
I am not my skills but...
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
791
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 20:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Roime wrote:I do share your optimism about the future, tho. Irrational, I know.
I definitely share that dream you have in your sig :)
Soon, my precious, soon...
I am not my skills but...
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
791
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 20:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Heh, today I saw response from Greyscale posted somewhere, maybe at Testing subforum - that they want to limit or not extend number of options from client so I wouldn't count on anything being customizable :)
I am not my skills but...
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
Schmata Bastanold
Keep It Burning Stupid
799
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 13:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dino Boff wrote:I understand why miner would be butthurt about their gravs... But explorers should rejoice.
Ah, so probably that is true meaning of "exploration" expansion: frakking anybody who uses combat probes. Explobears rejoice!
I am not my skills but...
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
|
|
| |
|